
Online voyeurism refers to the act of capturing, recording, or distributing intimate images of a person without their consent. Under French law, this offense falls under the Penal Code and targets both the initial capture and the circulation of content on platforms or social networks. In response to the increase in these practices, legal and technical remedies have been structured, but their implementation remains poorly known to victims.
Criminal qualification of digital voyeurism and applicable texts

Voyeurism is punished by the Penal Code, which penalizes the capture of images or words in a private place without the consent of the person concerned. The dissemination of this content constitutes a distinct offense, aggravated when it occurs online.
Recommended read : How to reset a Whirlpool 6th Sense dryer in case of a malfunction?
The non-consensual dissemination of sexual images is specifically targeted by Article 226-2-1 of the Penal Code. This qualification covers stolen videos published on sites, forums, or messaging platforms, even if the person disseminating them is not the one who made the capture.
The distinction between capture and dissemination has a direct consequence on prosecutions. A person who shares a stolen intimate video, even by simply sharing it on a social network, can be subject to criminal prosecution just like the initial perpetrator. To better understand the legal framework applicable to voyeur videos in France, it is necessary to distinguish these two levels of criminal responsibility.
You may also like : Comparison of the Best Online Messaging Services to Stay Connected
Platform responsibility: obligation to remove and possible remedies

Competitors address the issue exclusively from the victim’s perspective. The angle of the legal obligations of hosts deserves particular attention, as it conditions the speed of content removal.
Under French law, platforms have a legal obligation to promptly remove manifestly illegal content as soon as they are notified. This obligation arises from the law for confidence in the digital economy (LCEN). In the event of inaction after notification, the civil and criminal liability of the host may be engaged.
In practice, the notification must adhere to specific formalities to be enforceable:
- Identification of the disputed content by its exact URL, accompanied by a timestamped screenshot
- Description of the alleged offense (invasion of privacy, non-consensual dissemination of intimate images) with reference to the applicable articles of the Penal Code
- Identification of the sender of the notification (name, address, justification of their status as a victim or representative)
This notification procedure allows for removal without waiting for the outcome of a judicial process. If the platform does not respond within a reasonable time, the victim may initiate a liability action against the host, distinct from that targeting the author of the capture or dissemination.
Filing a complaint and reporting: concrete steps for the victim
Before taking any action, preserving evidence is a technical step that should not be overlooked. Videos can quickly disappear from a site, complicating the demonstration of the offense in court.
Building a digital evidence file
A screenshot alone has limited evidential value. A bailiff’s report (now a justice commissioner) conducted on the online content before its removal remains the strongest evidence. This report records the URL, the displayed content, and the metadata accessible at a specific moment.
In parallel, keeping exchanges with the alleged author (messages, emails, platform notifications) strengthens the file. Each element must be timestamped and stored on a durable medium.
Filing a complaint and using online services
The complaint can be filed at the police station, gendarmerie, or directly with the public prosecutor by mail. Since April 2024, the THESEE platform has been expanded to include more complaints related to online offenses, including cases of content dissemination when they are part of blackmail or related fraud.
This online service allows for centralized processing by specialized services of the Ministry of the Interior, which accelerates the referral of the file to the competent cybercrime investigators.
Institutional prevention and evolution of the educational framework
The treatment of online voyeurism is not limited to the repressive aspect. The official training documents from Éduscol for the period 2024-2026 now explicitly include voyeurism and the non-consensual dissemination of sexual images in the programs for education on affective, relational, and sexual life in high school.
This shift marks a paradigm change: digital voyeurism becomes a theme of institutional prevention, addressed in schools and no longer solely as an individual criminal issue. Organizations like Point de Contact and initiatives like Cybermalveillance.gouv.fr complement this network by providing reporting tools accessible to victims and witnesses.
Feedback from these organizations since 2023 confirms that the combination of action against the perpetrator, notification to the platform, and reporting to specialized authorities produces the fastest results in terms of content removal. Acting on only one of these levers often leaves the content accessible for weeks or even months.
The French legal framework today offers precise tools to pursue online voyeurism perpetrators and obtain the removal of stolen videos. The difficulty lies less in the legislative arsenal than in the victims’ knowledge of these mechanisms and the speed with which they build their evidence file before any content disappears.